|
Friday, June 6, 2008Judy Sgro Questions the Government on NAFTA-GateHon. Judy Sgro (York West, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the investigation into the NAFTA-gate affair clearly was a whitewash. Key individuals who had access to the diplomatic memo were not interviewed or even contacted. The Republican farm team over there, the Canadian Conservatives, were obviously trying to help their bush league friends. Why was Frank Sensenbrenner, the Republican operative that the government embedded in the Canadian embassy, not even questioned as part of this so-called investigation? Hon. Peter Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform, CPC): Mr. Speaker, there was a thorough inquiry into this and involved an outside firm and it was actually criticized by the opposition. Members of the opposition criticized that it was taking too long. Now that it is out, I am hearing them say that time should have been spent interviewing another 200-plus people who had been recipients of the email, although it was assessed where it had been redistributed, where possible, by those individuals. The bottom line findings of the inquiry were twofold. First, there was no leak of classified information by the Prime Minister's chief of staff. Second, there was an error in how the document was classified and to whom it was distributed. Hon. Judy Sgro (York West, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, it is just another phony investigation by the government. It is no surprise that the government conveniently finds itself innocent when it investigates itself. What a joke. Canadians are not going to believe that. Not only is the report a charade, but parliamentary committees are now being stonewalled from looking further into the issue. What is the government trying to hide? It only asks more questions. How can Canadians trust the government and accept the findings of its report when it is clouded in secrecy and so obviously flawed?
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|